
April 2019 | ISE Magazine 53
long lead times for introducing AM parts
into mission-critical applications in de-
fense. The unique benefits of rapid build
time and unique microstructural control
offered by AM processes cannot be fully
realized without real-time process tech-
nologies that accelerate performance-
based qualification and certification.
Mississippi State University research-
ers collaborated with the U.S. Army
Research Laboratory (ARL) to develop
machine learning methods for facilitat-
ing the laboratory to fabrication (lab-to-
fab) transition of AM technology. This
ongoing collaboration utilizes LBAM
to customize lightweight, complex parts
while maintaining mechanical proper-
ties and quality. The LBAM process
provides the capability to tailor the ap-
plication and reduce weight to ensure
the resilient platforms and systems that
meet the Army’s modernization needs.
This interdisciplinary team included
Ph.D. student Mojtaba Khanzadeh,
former Mississippi State student Su-
dipta Chowdhury, professors Haley R.
Doude, Mohammad Marufuzzaman
and Linkan Bian, all from the Bagley
College of Engineering at Mississippi
State University, and ARL scientist
Mark Tschopp, now regional lead of
ARL Central. In their research paper,
“In-Situ Monitoring of Melt Pool Imag-
es for Porosity Prediction in Laser-based
Additive Manufacturing Processes,” the
team developed a new machine-learn-
ing method that used sensor data (melt
pool thermal image streams from ex-
tensive experimental studies) to predict
defects in the resultant part (locations
of porosity measured via CT scan). The
study demonstrates the efficacy of real-
time process monitoring for defects in
LBAM.
The success of this research signifi-
cantly contributes to real-time process
monitoring and control technologies,
which will improve the quality, pro-
ductivity and cost reduction required
for wide adoption of metal AM pro-
cesses. This critical study has wide-
reaching implications for accelerating
the selection and optimization of build
parameters and developing a better fun-
damental understanding of the interac-
tion of material and process on LBAM
component properties. Both are neces-
sary components for reaching the goal
of “lab-to-fab,” efficiently transitioning
“laboratory” research to component-
level “fabrication” in industry.
CONTACT: Linkan Bian; bian@ise.msstate.edu;
(662) 325-0570; Mississippi State University, 260
McCain Building, Mississippi State University,
MS 39762.
A dynamic target volatility
strategy for asset allocation
Since the collapse of Lehman Brothers
in 2008, it has become increasingly im-
portant for investors to manage financial
risk through tail risk hedging. This is
especially true of institutional inves-
tors with long-term investments such
as funds and insurance companies who
have established a risk-control strategy
known as “target volatility” to maintain
a predetermined level of volatility for a
portfolio.
The target volatility strategy system-
atically adjusts the investment propor-
tion of the portfolio between a risky and
a risk-free asset to maintain a desired
level of target volatility. Accurately fore-
casting the volatility of the risky asset
return is a critical task when implement-
ing a target volatility strategy.
In “A Dynamic Target Volatil-
ity Strategy for Asset Allocation using
Artificial Neural Networks,” authors
Youngmin Kim from Soonchunhy-
ang University and David Enke from
the Missouri University of Science and
Technology developed an intelligent
target volatility strategy for asset alloca-
tion. The strategy provides a volatility
forecast using artificial neural networks,
based in part on a stability-oriented ap-
proach (SOA), while also incorporating
target volatility.
The model is unique in that it ap-
plies an SOA based on statistical tests to
compare data from the current period to
a past set of data from a stable period.
This research summary highlights
an article from Volume 63, No.
4, of The Engineering Economist.
Many investors manage risk by
attempting to maintain a constant
target level of volatility in their
portfolios. In this article, the
authors use an artificial neural
network to forecast the volatility of a
risky asset based on historical data
and equivalent futures contracts.
Mississippi State University researchers involved in the “lab to fab” project for additive
manufacturing included (from left) Ph.D. student Mojtaba Khanzadeh and professors
Mohammad Marufuzzaman, Haley R. Doude and Linkan Bian.
Mark Tschopp Sudipta Chowdhury